
As the No side’s lead in Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum polling grows, those holding out any hope of reversing the trend are focusing on “soft No” and undecided voters.
References to “hard” and “soft” voters come from polls that ask respondents how sure they are that they will vote a certain way. Those who pick the highest level of certainty are labelled as “hard” voters; the rest are considered “soft” and more persuadable to switch. This concept also appears in elections, where it is usual for the intending Labor vote to appear slightly softer than the Coalition’s.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.